SpaceX reportedly wants 80,000 US cell sites: Crown Castle jumps 9%, AT&T and T-Mobile fall 6%
Bloomberg reports SpaceX is in talks to access at least 80,000 cell sites to build a fourth US wireless carrier. Nothing is confirmed, and analysts say any real competitive impact is years away.
Telecom stocks sold off and tower owners rallied on Friday after Bloomberg News reported, citing unnamed people, that SpaceX is in talks to gain access to at least 80,000 cell sites in the United States. The aim, according to the report as relayed by Reuters, is to build a wireless carrier "from scratch." Crown Castle was named as one of the infrastructure companies in the discussions. SpaceX and the tower operators did not immediately respond to requests for comment, and no denial was reported.
How the stocks moved
Nasdaq quotes read at about 1:50 PM ET on Friday:
| Company | Price | Change on the day |
|---|---|---|
| Crown Castle (CCI) | $86.20 | +9.35% |
| American Tower (AMT) | $187.46 | +3.24% |
| SBA Communications (SBAC) | $182.90 | +2.53% |
| AT&T (T) | $21.29 | -6.40% |
| T-Mobile (TMUS) | $149.34 | -5.95% |
| Verizon (VZ) | $44.61 | -1.32% |
Moves were larger or smaller earlier in the session, and outlets quote different intraday numbers. CNBC's midday list had AT&T and T-Mobile each down more than 5% and Verizon down 1%, with Crown Castle up about 10% and American Tower up 3%. Reuters reported Deutsche Telekom, which holds more than half of T-Mobile, fell 3.2% in Europe, and that SpaceX shares rose 1.7%.
Why the tower owners win in the story
A tower company earns rent from each carrier that mounts equipment on its structures. A new tenant that needs tens of thousands of sites is, to a landlord, simply more demand for space it already owns. That is why the same headline lifts the landlords and hits the tenants who would face a new competitor. It is also the market's reading, not a fact: no lease, price or timetable has been disclosed.
What this follows, and what is still unknown
The report comes two weeks after SpaceX said it would buy low-band spectrum from Grain Management, which sent the big three carriers sharply lower after hours. We covered that deal here. That purchase needs FCC approval. Reuters noted Starlink today earns its money from internet service in sparsely populated and rural areas, and that becoming a true carrier rival would take years and a ground network.
Bernstein, quoted by Reuters, said the competitive impact may be years away, but that anticipation alone is likely to weigh on the sector. It also said a wholesale (MVNO) arrangement with SpaceX may not appeal to the carriers. We could not confirm the number of sites, the terms or the other parties beyond Bloomberg's account.
What it means for a business owner
For a shop, contractor or restaurant paying for a fleet of business lines, nothing changes this week: there is no new carrier, no new plan and no price. The practical point is longer term. Rural and job-site coverage is where a satellite-linked carrier would be strongest first, so owners of farms, trucking firms and field-service crews are the customers a new entrant would court. If you are signing a multi-year carrier contract, the useful question is whether it locks you in past the point a new option could exist, and the answer to that is a contract-length question, not a stock-market one.
Sources: Bloomberg News report as relayed by Reuters (Investing.com); CNBC; Nasdaq.com quotes read about 1:50 PM ET, Oct 23, 2026; Chronicle reporting on the Grain Management spectrum deal. Some data may be delayed. This is market information, not investment advice.
Want your business to be the answer?
Get a full package of articles about your business, built so customers, Google and AI assistants can find you.
New ebook from The Company ChronicleHow to Research Like a Wall Street AnalystFind original sources, analyze trends, and build your own insights. 36 pages with worksheets.Get the ebook · $29Instant PDF download
